Skip to content

Conversation

@sjanc
Copy link
Contributor

@sjanc sjanc commented May 24, 2022

LE Write Suggested Default Data Length and LE Set Data Length commands
are suggestions from host and should be validated only as per HCI
specification regarding internal setting of LLCP.

LLCP is allowed to use other values is needed.

fixes #44164

Signed-off-by: Szymon Janc [email protected]

@sjanc sjanc force-pushed the dle_hci_param branch 2 times, most recently from dfe1cfa to 9e183a5 Compare May 30, 2022 09:25
@sjanc sjanc removed the area: API Changes to public APIs label May 30, 2022
@kruithofa
Copy link

fixes #44164

@sjanc sjanc marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2022 13:07
@zephyrbot zephyrbot requested review from erbr-ot, mtpr-ot and wopu-ot July 6, 2022 13:07
@sjanc sjanc force-pushed the dle_hci_param branch 3 times, most recently from e571495 to bac8467 Compare July 7, 2022 08:26
@carlescufi
Copy link
Member

@cvinayak please review

Copy link
Contributor

@cvinayak cvinayak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good and do not affect the conformance tests (HCI tests pass). The CI failure needs addressing though.

LE Write Suggested Default Data Length and LE Set Data Length commands
are suggestions from host and should be validated only as per HCI
specification regarding internal setting of LLCP.

LLCP is allowed to use other values if needed.

Signed-off-by: Szymon Janc <[email protected]>
Some tests assume that if IUT accepted HCI_LE_Set_Data_Length command
than HCI_LE_Data_Length_Change event will always be sent. This is not
the case anymore as HCI_LE_Data_Length_Change is sent only if effective
parameters changed.

Those tests should be re-enabled when EDDT implementation is updated.

Signed-off-by: Szymon Janc <[email protected]>
@jori-nordic jori-nordic removed their request for review September 1, 2022 13:32
@cvinayak
Copy link
Contributor

cvinayak commented Sep 7, 2022

No objections from me. If this is passing latest TCRL based conformance tests, you have my approval.

@thoh-ot Please get a review at your side.

Copy link
Contributor

@erbr-ot erbr-ot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - did an EBQ run (HCI and CON tests) with this commit on Oticon target with no added failures.

@kruithofa kruithofa requested a review from cvinayak September 22, 2022 08:06
@fabiobaltieri
Copy link
Member

Should this go for 3.2.0? The matching issue is tagged as Enhancement... tagging for 3.3.0, feel free to move it as necessary.

@fabiobaltieri fabiobaltieri added this to the v3.3.0 milestone Sep 22, 2022
@carlescufi carlescufi merged commit f09220d into zephyrproject-rtos:main Oct 3, 2022
@sjanc sjanc deleted the dle_hci_param branch March 31, 2023 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement the equivalent of PR #44102 in LLCP

6 participants